Political    Social    Culture    Economy    Tourism    Entertainment    Sports    Culinary    Movie   
Click Once.. Thank You!!!

Random Post

    Obama regulations on administration proposes commercial drones amid security, privacy concerns



    President Obama on Sunday announced plans to regulate the use of small, commercial drones -- attempting to get ahead of safety, privacy and economic issues as the unmanned aircraft quickly become more a part of everyday American life.
    Obama said in a presidential memorandum that drones are already a more flexible and less-expensive alternative to piloted aircraft for public and private users. And they could play “a transformative role” in urban infrastructure management, farming, public safety, coastal security, military training, search and rescue and disaster response.
    The president has given federal agencies at least 90 days to start drafting guidelines, but the Federal Aviation Administration on Sunday released preliminary rules in conjunction with the memorandum.
    Among the chores that federal officials envision drones performing are aerial photography and mapping, crop monitoring and inspecting cell towers, bridges and other tall structures.
    However, the proposal includes safety restrictions such as keeping drones within sight of operators at all times and no nighttime flights, which could mean no pizza or Amazon package deliveries by drone.
    Commercial operators, for example, will have to take an FAA-administered knowledge test and pass a Transportation Security Administration security check to fly small drones, defined as weighing less than 55 pounds, according to the proposal.
    The final rules still could be two or three years away.
    Even if the White House approves the FAA's proposal, the agency must offer a public comment period, and tens of thousands of comments are anticipated and must be addressed before final regulations are issued.
    The FAA currently bans all commercial drone flights except for those by a small number of companies that have been granted waivers. Congress has been leaning on the agency to move faster on regulations that would allow a wide variety of companies to employ drones.
    Under a law passed in 2012, the FAA was to issue final regulations by September 2015, but that appears unlikely.
    "We have tried to be flexible in writing these rules," said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. "We want to maintain today's outstanding level of aviation safety without placing an undue regulatory burden on an emerging industry."  He said the agency intends to issue final rules as quickly as it can.
    Brian Wynne, president and chief executive officer of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, a trade group, called the proposed rules "a good first step" toward bringing the United States closer to realizing the benefits of drone technology.
    The memorandum also lays out measures federal agencies must follow to guard against abuse of data collected in drone flights and states they must have polices that “prohibit the collection, use, retention or dissemination of data in any manner that would violate the First Amendment or in any manner that would discriminate against persons based upon their ethnicity, race, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity.”
    The FAA analysis suggests drones -- officially known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems -- would be safer than heavier, manned aircraft in such operations as cell-tower and other high-tower monitoring, citing 95 fatalities involving climbers from 2004 to 2012.     
    Officials have not made public an estimate of the total annual economic benefit of regulations but say it would exceed $100 million a year.
    For example, about 45,000 annual bridge inspections could be conducted with small drones, they say.
    The document indicates the agency has dropped its insistence that drone operators have the same licenses and medical certificates required for pilots of manned aircraft. Industry officials complained that obtaining a private pilot license or medical certificate would be unnecessarily burdensome. The agency estimates the cost to operators of obtaining certificate at about $300.
    A private pilot license can cost thousands of dollars because it requires many hours of experience flying a plane.
    Operators would have to fly drones at less than 500 feet, which is below where most manned aircraft fly. That's 100 feet higher than the agency typically has approved in waivers to commercial operators.
    The line-of-sight requirement would preclude delivery drone of the type envisioned by Amazon. Google is also experimenting with such drones.
    Industry officials have chafed at both restrictions, saying they significantly reduce the usefulness of unmanned aircraft. The FAA's concern is that with no pilot on board, the operator on the ground is best able to prevent a collision with another aircraft by keep the drone in sight at all times.
    The FAA analysis was first reported by Forbes on Saturday.
    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    LETTING ISIS OFF EASY? Democrats, GOP criticize Obama's military plan


    Congressional Democrats and Republicans on Sunday criticized the proposal President Obama recently submitted to Capitol Hill on defeating The Islamic State, suggesting it doesn't go far enough.
    Some of the most pointed criticism came from Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
    He said the part of the proposal that limits the use of U.S. military force to three years is "not appropriate."
    "We don't want to send a signal to the world that we're there for just so many years,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Unfortunately, this battle is going to take a long time. … I think we’d be better off with a resolution without a specific time limit.”
    The draft proposal that Obama submitted to Congress last week also calls for limited use of U.S. ground troops and no geographical limits on going after the extremist groups.
    If approved, the Authorization for Use of Military Force would repeal the 2002 one that President George W. Bush used for the war in Iraq.
    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, argued on “Meet the Press” that Obama should have broad authority and that Congress restricting him might be unconstitutional.
    McCain also said he continues to push for more U.S. military presence around the world because the president shouldn’t have pulled out of some hotspots -- like Afghanistan and Iraq.
    "You have to have a stabilizing force,” he said. “You're going to also have to have American boots on the ground. That does not mean massive numbers. … But it does mean forward air controllers, Special Forces and many others."
    He also said Obama probably doesn’t need congressional authority, but Congress should debate the issue.
    To be sure, leaders of the Republican-run House and Senate on Sunday vowed a full debate, starting when members return Feb. 24.
    “We're going to have exhaustive hearings” in the House’s Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services committees, Speaker John Boehner told “Fox News Sunday.”
    Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told CBS’ “Face the Nation”: “We’re going to begin a robust set of hearings as soon as we get back.”
    He also questioned the administration’s commitment to dealing with the Islamic State, suggested the president’s proposal doesn’t go far enough in stating the U.S. strategy in Syria.

    Muscle & Fitness USA - Get Ripped Like BRUCE LEE (March 2013)

    Muscle & Fitness USA - Get Ripped Like BRUCE LEE (March 2013)

    Rolling Stone USA - Games of Thrones Secrets of Season 3 (11 April 2013)

    Rolling Stone USA - Games of Thrones Secrets of Season 3 (11 April 2013)

    National Geographic Traveler - June July 2013 USA

    National Geographic Traveler - June July 2013 USA

    The Week USA - Another Fine Mess (14 June 2013 (HQ PDF))

    The Week USA - Another Fine Mess (14 June 2013 (HQ PDF))

    Popular Science USA - The Future of Flights (July 2013)

    Popular Science USA - The Future of Flights (July 2013)

     
    Copyright © 2015 News Collection about U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Blogger
    Template by Creating Website and CB Blogger